Millions of Americans rely on their 401(k) plans to ensure a comfortable retirement, but recent research from Vanguard has found that many workers may be falling prey to a common pitfall that could cause them to miss out on thousands in savings – even as much as $300,000.
The issue revolves around a typical experience for an American worker: switching jobs. When people jump to a new position, they are often paid more; at the same time, they frequently make the mistake of enrolling in their new 401(k) plan at a lower contribution level than at their prior employer.
The resulting irony is that while many Americans enjoy higher incomes due to a job switch, they frequently end up saving less in their 401(k)s, undercutting the growth of their nest egg. One reason, the Vanguard researchers found, is tied to the fact that the most common default savings rates in 401(k) plan stands at 3%, so that when workers switch jobs, many automatically enroll at that rate, even though they may have been saving a higher percentage at their prior employer.
The result creates a falling pattern of savings rates when people switch jobs, noted Fiona Greig, global head of investor research and policy at Vanguard and a co-author of the report, which analyzed retirement and income data from more than 50,000 people who switched jobs.
“Sure enough, most people are switching jobs in order to get a pay raise — the typical raise was 10%,” Greig noted. “64% are seeing a pay increase when they move jobs, but we’re seeing an opposite trend in their savings rate.”
The typical job-switcher sees a decline of almost 1 percentage point in their 401(k) contributions, their research found.
Over time, that can add up, robbing workers of thousands of dollars in retirement income. Take a worker who starts her career with an annual income of $60,000, and then switches jobs eight times after that — the typical number of job changes for Americans.
By lowering her contribution amount each time she jumps to a new job, she’ll have saved a total of $470,000 in her 401(k) by the time she turns 65. But if she had kept her contribution rate steady at about 10% for most of her career, she would have $770,000 by the time she hit retirement age.
“In the most tangible terms, it’s six fewer years of retirement spending,” Greig noted. “It’s a material drop in retirement wealth.”