American News Group

Time to rethink your retirement — the ‘4% rule’ just changed

For more than a quarter century, many retirement savers have obediently followed the “4% rule” to make sure their money lasts for the long haul.

Now, its creator says people have always treated his rule too simply — and cheated themselves out of a lot of fun money in their later years.

Here’s what this savings sage is currently saying about how to live a rich yet responsible retirement.

What was the 4% rule?

Created in 1994 by California-based financial adviser William Bengen, the 4% rule establishes the maximum amount you can safely withdraw from your savings each year to ensure you don’t run out before you die. Bengen dubbed his rule “Safemax.”

To be safe, the 4% rule says you should aim to spend no more than 4% of your total retirement fund in the first year, then adjust that amount in subsequent years for inflation. It assumes you’re using a tax-advantaged account and you might live for 30 years after retirement.

Unfortunately, the amount of money you’d need in the bank to stick to the 4% rule can be quite daunting. If you want to maintain an annual income stream of $50,000, you’d need to have $1.25 million when you retire.

Bengen updated his Safemax guideline to 4.5% in 2006 — slightly more manageable — but many financial advisers have continued to recommend 4% as the maximum withdrawal during the first year.

Bengen recently offered an entirely new perspective on his time-honored rule of thumb, and it could make saving for your retirement easier.

How has the rule changed?

In an article for the October issue of Financial Advisor Magazine, Bengen explains that the 4% rule was always based on the worst-case scenario: people who retired in the fall of 1968.

The ill-fated retirees would see poor returns on their investments during a long bear market and inflation that soared to triple digits in the 1970s and early ’80s. Skyrocketing prices sapped the purchasing power of the money seniors had saved up.

Under these conditions, 4% was the maximum amount you could withdraw each year and still live comfortably.

However, Bengen says, workers who retired in better times could have and should have spent more. Between the years 1926 and 1990, the average Safemax was 7%, and at certain points it reached as high as 13%.

So is 4% or 4.5% too conservative? While you can’t predict the future, Bengen says you should open your eyes to current conditions instead of blindly following the rule.

Speaking to the media after his article’s release, Bengen suggested that 5% seems like a safe number today. That may not seem like a lot, but it actually makes a huge difference. By adopting this new guideline, you would need to save $250,000 less in order to keep your yearly income at $50,000.

How do I save enough to live well?

Even if you’re aiming to withdraw just 5% of your savings each year, gathering a million bucks or more before you leave the workforce can be a tall order.

Here are a few moves you can make now to speed up your savings:

Exit mobile version