Flash heating technique extracts valuable metals from battery waste quickly and cheaply
A cost-effective new way of recovering metals directly from lithium-ion battery waste could significantly reduce the environmental impact of these ubiquitous devices while cutting the time required to recycle them almost 100-fold. Developed by scientists at Rice University in the US, the technique is known as flash Joule heating, and it has already been used to recover valuable metals from other forms of electronic waste without toxic solvents and with less energy than current laboratory methods.
“Currently, 95% of batteries are not recycled because we don’t have the capacity to recycle them, even as waste from electronics is increasing at an annual rate of 9%,” says James Tour, the Rice nanoscientist who led the project. The recent popularity of electric cars adds urgency to the problem, he adds: “Batteries in electric vehicles last about 10 years, and many of those are coming due now, because it’s been about 10 years that we’ve been using them.”
Spent batteries that are not recycled mostly end up in landfill, as do many other forms of electronic waste (e-waste). This is bad for the environment, as e-waste often contains heavy metals, including some that are toxic. It is also a missed commercial opportunity, since e-waste could in principle be an important and sustainable source of precious metals such as rhodium, palladium, silver, and gold as well as less costly elements like chromium, cadmium, lead and mercury.
The problem is that e-waste recycling methods are far from perfect. The most common ones are based on pyrometallurgy, which involves creating a molten soup of metals at high temperatures. These methods lack selectivity, are energy intensive and produce hazardous, heavy-metal-bearing fumes, especially when the waste contains metals with relatively low melting points such as mercury, cadmium or lead.
Other techniques use hydrometallurgy, which involves leaching metals out of e-waste using acids, bases or cyanide. While these methods are more selective, they produce large quantities of liquid or sludgy waste and involve chemical reactions that are kinetically slow and thus hard to scale up. “A lot of current battery recycling processes involve the use of very strong acids, and these tend to be messy, cumbersome processes,” Tour observes.
A further alternative, biometallurgy, separates metals by harnessing natural biological processes in microorganisms, but this promising family of techniques is still in its infancy.